top of page

Rep. Mark Wright Introduces Resolution Against Misleading Credit Card Legislation

In a recent move on the floor of the House, Representative Mark Wright brought attention to House Concurrent Resolution 102 (HCR 102), an important legislation addressing deceptive practices within the credit card industry. The resolution, having passed with an overwhelming vote of 90-0, indicates a bipartisan recognition of the potential dangers hidden within a bill or amendment supposedly beneficial to consumers that is circulating in Washington, D.C.

During the deliberations, Wright, a strong advocate of consumer rights and transparent financial regulations, eloquently voiced his concerns. One memorable quote from his presentation captures the essence of his stance: “HCR 102 has to do with a bill or amendment that is making its way in DC related to Credit Card administration. Unfortunately, it's been pitched as an idea to help consumers when in reality, from history and from current analysis, it would create other issues.”

The core issue at hand, as illustrated by Wright, revolves around the misleading portrayal of certain legislative proposals. The language used to promote these initiatives often emphasizes advantages for consumers, but closer examination reveals potential downsides that could worsen current issues instead of resolving them.

When pressed about the specifics of the proposed legislation in Congress, Wright clarified, “Essentially what it would do is it would limit options that any type of store would use. It's pitched to be something that is saving some consumer money, but at the end of the day, it's gonna force it through one of the two or three big companies that deal with those things so it's gonna end up creating fewer options quite frankly.”

His remarks shed light on the complexity in crafting financial regulations. While the overarching objective is commendable—to shield consumers from sky-high fees and shady tactics—the potential unintended consequences could result in control of credit card services by a handful of big companies.. This scenario would lead to reduced options for consumers, potentially exacerbating rather than alleviating the issues at hand.

Wright drew upon past experiences to bolster his argument, noting, “Years ago, there was a bill that passed somewhat related to this that essentially said it did one thing, and in fact, reality, the money just stayed where it was, and so consumers didn't even benefit.” This shows how crucial it is to carefully assess and examine proposed financial laws to steer clear of repeating previous errors.

Rep. Mark Wright's introduction of HCR 102 and following approval with overwhelming support for this resolution demonstrates lawmakers' shared recognition of the potential consequences of poorly formulated financial regulations. Through their unanimous approval, the House exhibits a united dedication to protecting consumer interests and enhancing transparency in financial legislation. By challenging misleading narratives and advocating for consumer interests, Wright and his collaborators aim to ensure that legislative efforts genuinely benefit those they intend to serve.


bottom of page